Waiting for [Calm Cast]

[...]
In [brackets],
this is a big deal.

By this I mean, yes I am actually waiting for Comcast to check on the strength of my signals. Meanwhile, the President has taken some guff for his ESPN time, [yet] he did kill two birds with one stone by making a plea for aid to the triple disaster in Japan. And by "big deal", I mean the UN vote not getting one veto of its resolution for use of "all necessary measures" to protect civilians in Libya. This may be the un- mess age. It may be about the choices we make.

Now...before I embolden the most need to read or view, I will add that I did not* have all these links when I hit the keyboard this morning. My point is that waiting for the right time to...

[QED/FOOTNOTE: A subsidiary point is that no matter the actions even the president takes, we just can't win without the butterfly(see NOT) of politics. Even this QED was not about finetuning the general idea, until it flapped its wings and did more than footnote. It was actually about the idea that I only had a footnote and the above needed no more.]

* double negative? On point of having message before hand(or (maybe not).

[UPDATE: Comcast** is yet to arrive, [and NewsNation has yet to have clip available] but the President just made an announcement. He is bridging the signals gap and being a uniter not burning Bush.]

** yet this is a convenient(or inconvenient) thread (or what)

Justice?

It is more about narrative than justice.

Many will agree killing bin Laden is justice, some will call it an execution. Some say President Obama did not give President Bush enough credit. Some will say that he bin Laden deserves more. I think the poor ridge is just right. And to summit up:

As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not -- and never will be -- at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.

This is more than a mixed metaphor or mountain out of a moldy nursery tale*.

* link updated
[I have been meaning to focus on labels, updates and other project improvements. Here is a New Label**, The Golden Rule(also my photos) Also I should note my evolution from a lack of links to way too much linking. Hence the not so middle ground of this piece.]

** Now Labels label needs to be edited and updated to only New Label references. Now that is Poetic Justice or is it? It is another need to update or scroll over, to see the difference between search and labels.
[needed footnotes?]

[QED: Movement in one data point does not correlate with movement in another data point, especially when they are not in context or adjusted. Math is not a narrative, it is a process. Equations are more of a narrative but require enough data points and sufficient interpretation. There can be more jobless claims and more jobs added, which are independent of each other. OK, I have not QED'd anything but a hunch I just described and which apparently the data shows.]
[Semi-related? Calling it a gutsy call is not spiking a football. Let alone an improper linkage.]
[...not to mention right column navigations, scroll overs, see comments, labels and bold.]

ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]

[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ](*)
page i
[ACTUAL POST DATE 7-5-12]


(i) want to back this up.
Pardon the pun on Her-man, not to mention His-story.

QED? (not exactly)
A: Etch-A-Sketch 2.0
B: bs-Cain
C: bs-Cain+flop
D: bs-Romney
E: bs-her+story
(A throuh E are the scroll overs for this post.)

Back-up for 1,2,3
i.e. footnotes from QED up. 
(From Etch-a-Sketch 2.0, I wish to back-up the links from the bottom up.)
I. "Strategy" bs Rosen ( a, b, c, d )
II. "attacks" bs vaccine ( a, b )
III. "vaccinating" Contempt for Courage

IV: "behind" bs zipper ( a, b )

V: "math" bs S.E. ( a, b, c, d , e, f, *)
VI: "due" bs Kant+Hegel ( a **   )
VII: "vu" bs die+manics ( a, b, )

* will not include search find for this post
[by George it works: a - f = 6 ***]
** does not include embedded bs (blog searches)
*** provided the al gore rythms hold
[Not to further parse the links but so far it holds 4gore = a - l]
(*) asterisk * updated

String Cheese Theory?

Or Quantum Theory of Mitt ?

Related Strings:

Ouch[!]

Q E D [!].

You** Tube
Double* Ouch![?]

[Matter / Anti-matter ?  The Declaration of Independence does not have a preamble. Note that Speaker BaneOr misquoted the Constitution, which does have a preamble.  He was quoting the Declaration of Independence which does not have a preamble.  It matters that Rachel Maddow did issue an apology.  Should it Anti-matter that NewsBusters thinks it does? Quote:

 Of course, if she or her crack fact-checking team at MSNBC had done their homework, they would have found "We hold these truths to be self-evident" does indeed come from the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence and not the Preamble to the Constitution as Boehner said. 

     It seems they gaffed their own smug face.

Alas, when one fact checks, especially as arrogantly as Maddow does, you should be completely accurate or you end up looking like a bigger jackass than the person you're mocking.
That oughta wipe the smug, condescending smirk off her face!

Right?]

[Speaking ***^ of Flip Flop? QED!
And I don't mean cue Ed, nor buy George or Bill-E-Club !
But D E^^ Vo ! ?]


*Schoolhouse Oops?
Woe? [!]
** Original Rachel Link is missing under You "THE Word".
*** Bingo [!]

^ Think Progress's link on President Obama's personal evolution.  It is the people that must make the political and legal fight. A president's opinion does not make either federal or state law.  Not that he is not responsible for interpreting and enforcing them.

^^  a day that will live in infamy?
NOT!  Thom Hartmann caller on radio.

5-10-12  Related Issues? Or matters ?
Now with Alex Wagner "The Book of Mormon".

Un-P.C.(Or Read Meet?)

[reference asterisk *]
[The following is posted on 5-31-12 although continuance of 5-26 material]
Cow Pies: 

QED? * http://lbo-news.com/2012/05/26/bain-actually-loves-dems/

Footnotes:
[1] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Simpson+Bowles
[2] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Bowles+Simpson
[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jared-bernstein/private-equity-firms-what_b_1545342.html

[4] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/badge-of-courage.html
[5] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/tar-buck.html
[6] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/clinton-is-full-of-bs.html
[7] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Turd

WTF?

What the Fudge?
Or rather Fungible?
Transition of sorts.*

*anachronism
(fn)^

^ {re done duncy? Heck no. Dot/dot/dot ?}

Note to check Elements of Style and bracketing, not to mention lastest bibliotech4mating in the spirit of style or E.B. White, Ie/my Transition of sorts. C-*,^, #'n 'n ),(,],{.  No emoticon N-tendoughed.  
(case in point: l5 QeD@} Speaking of legends/?\...

Etch-A-Sketch 2.0

Or is that redundant? 
Original intent* was Enough Smirking 2.0.
*or 3.0?[Or admiration for nuance]
[Anyway, choice of language was why I was reticent to continue the references to Smirking or Sketches.  I mean when does the Etch-A-Sketch stop?  I guess it is the nature of campaigns, like a Glenn Beck chalk talk.]
[Speaking of sourcing:

“Unless things change and Obama can run on accomplishments, he will have to kill Romney,” said a prominent Democratic strategist aligned with the White House. 

Needless to say this is disgusting and should be disavowed by the campaign.  However the full context just may be important, not that we have it !  Oar have we?] 



**Nature that [!]



[Hint: There is a Mitt of a geometricks re:sourcing. 
Or Platonic Multiplicity. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Vu due the math.]

[Hint 2.0?  The shortest distance between two points is a punchline. Ouch, not my point, but maybe Romney's straightline.  It's geometry, politics and the table.  Is Raw Money hiding behind Little Red Riding Hood?  Or vaccinating attacks strategy?***]

QED ?
*** Foot N. O. T.?
[TBA: PAGES and De-Baits! i.e.(Note to self) Obama v. Romney recent speeches.  JOBS/SCOTUS]
[It's not just me ? (7-6-12) Not Exactly !  The  Para-Gone Seg way ?  More later. ]

Running Joke

Guilt by association, innocent my label.
Well rather*, she runs...innocent by no association with reality.

Upon first hearing of the Christine O'Donnell victory, my first reaction was hmmm, a new and improved Sarah Palin. But in all actuality, for an English major? She is rather loose with her labels. She attended Phoenix Institute which rented space at an Oxford campus, and she attended Claremont Instute which she labeled "Claremont Graduate University". And apparently her English major might be actually English Literature, but she may have made up for any deficiencies. Her employment record seems to be heavily reliant on her academic studies[**], not that she has recorded much income or communicated clearly. But if it was not her who communicated these errors, just who was paid to commit them? My point is...that problem is solved.
[Bottom line: She studied Constitutional Government under a graduate fellowship at a conservative think tank. QED: by degree in lipstick.]

* original paraphrase: Some run with "Guilt by association, but are guilty of (& innocent by) no association with reality". (But I often evolve mid-sentence, or mid-their revolution.)
[**] Zoominfo updated link.

Aye of Newt

The Interpretation of Dreams*
Pre and post Freud.(Nietszche/Jung)***
Projection of terms/Slash/Tools.
The difference between ends and means seems lost.

Speaking of lost, find Armey's only regret is "calling for" government shutdown before doing it.(My original source was MSNBC, but haven't located it.)
Well? Close enough and speaking of intent...not exactly.**
But is that Alinsky, or both ends against the middle or "authentically dishonest"?

Footnote: This was originally intended to hold some comments for later research, but worked out in the end, excessive links aside.
Label: Post-Nietzschean-Manichean-Platonics.
[Original footnote:(LABEL aside)I was not aware of earlier uses of Aye of Newt.]
* [the two links inserted later]
** [exactly(Forbes/D'Sousa)]
***[4 links added]
QED?
[progressive/pragmatic verses purity/pragmatic = incremental no slippery slope]
[See Comment.]
[One Nation & The Plan]

Budget Bandits?

Thanks to YouTube I became aware of the Budget Bandits in an ad by Ending Spending Inc.
Speaking of Strings and Leaps or Knot.

Yesterday President Obama evolved his personal position on marriage equality.
[Speaking ***^ of Flip Flop? QED! 
And I don't mean cue Ed, nor buy George or Bill-E-Club !
But D E^^ Vo ! ?]


On Monday I tied the knot of sorts.
[Not such a large leap?!] Knot! Really it is.


The above YouTube is Thom Hartmann* discussing President Obama's position with a caller.
[update of sorts][That's Rich!]
It is more than ironic that there is such a string related** ad associated with his YouTube.

* first link is segment of this link
** speaking of debt
*** originally asterisked here

.

[Martin Bashir ... digs in!]

[Bingo: Republicans oppose state's rights!]

[Tic Tac Toe!]@

@speaking of game changer

5-11-12 for later ?

5-15-12 Update. 

Para-model

I will begin at the end, or rather the present.
Less than two paragraphs in:
What's Left of the Left. Why do I begin at that moment? Allow me to begin again at this moment.
What is Left of the Left?
(the lede of the link)(4)***
Is this a geometric or quantitative heading?
What is not right about the left?
Or how much of the left is still there?

Now if I may do a Hansel and Gretel impersonation...my point is that I have worked out my path off-blog. i.e. left some pebbles to attempt to trace my path.
The reality is that I got the article from** MSNBC*, (current lede) Actually I got the link not the article. So I am still working it out, but will now save my Para-model.doc with this.

* actual clip here later
**anachronistic conundrum(or appropriate con un drum)[Cain beating the media.(1)]
*** post save doc: golf term "four"/Mulligan?

[Now I must note that I will square [bracket(#)] and or continue after reading more.]
[I should now note that I have left open a blog I was editing, which has now been inserted in my Para-model.doc ala my Hansel and Gretal MO. Apparently the pebbles were bread crumbs, but in reading What is Left of the Left, noticing that I have read only one of seven pages, I must MoveOn for the time being.]
[Now... actually just moments after the last bracket I will make a point.(see **(1) On what the heck is Cain doing? He is working the model of the media, in a fourth branch sort of way. He is getting attention, and I will sort out that fourth dimension. And I must note I am impressed with Joe the Plumber and Rupert the Survivor as candidates of a third kind. Not to call them, "Out There". But I think there is something to the polarity and needing more perspectives than our parties and branches provide. And this is reflected in a mechanics and dynamics, that is not just two dimensional. But Steven Jobs did point out to Rupert Murdoch that it can be either constructive or destructive. It is not about left or right, up or down, or forward or back again. It is about making progress or not. Everything else is how, and by and for whom? Does any of this embedded here or in my saved doc, explain: that the more radical a comment the more coverage it gets? It might depend on if one is Leaning Forward or Fair and Balanced. Now, I know that there is some perspectivism here, but Fair and Balanced does not mean two dimensional. Now it just depends on if I am talking about the Media or Faux News.]
[My apologies for my Quantum Leap over the Big Cheese, I feel my bread crumbs may be safe in draft see image.]


[Andrea Mitchell: Why has the president waited? Because he wanted congress to do their job! That was my preemptive answer to the preemptive question. Meaning, I was expecting the question and anticipated the answer, which just may be in the unfinished heading: What is Left of the Left.(No question mark or exclaimation mark?)]
[Speaking of Hands or Thumbs: L-curve anyone?]


[My para-model.doc is a bibliograpy of sorts(pun intended). Some Late Entries.: not to mention blog searches for con+scious, con+science, anarchy, tyranny, and thumb and buffet.]
[For the record Searches @thumb= Star Chamber/Big Cheese/Para-Model/Obama Doctrine/Who are they calling?. @buffet= Para-model/Big Cheese/From GOP to NOP/Brackets and Debt Clock/N-oddly Enough/All Politics is Local/Commander in Chief/Off the Cliff/Irony versus Hypocrisy. By this I am recording what the Al Gore Rythms find, just in case something changes.]
[This is bleapin' freaky considering my heading and intention here: The last of my late entries, and the last thing(or link) in my para-model.doc is this and (THIS)is the first thing Ed Schultz is talking about when I turn on his show. QED? Not to mention the rest of his show, which is yet to run(he is going on about Romney in Ohio? and a clear plan, and Democrats losing the message war, then Bernie Sanders and the NYtimes poll?), but is actually digitally delayed for local radio.]

Still going? QED?]

No0000![!]? (/\/)

or  //  know comment (...)*

*truly preemptive? ....'n a tad excla(i)mative
(trasitive pin: kotter pun?)
(O W ..<)^

^ re done duncy?

12-9-13 

(/\/)** : by Jove my peripheral vision is acting up again, or only up to "Cap and Trade."
My post headline was about the adjacent "recent posts" (2&3) of the FlowChangeSensei, not his verbal usage in the link I happened to snag(1) off my desk top. 

** also Re:My headline originally written "as is" or as it flowed, referencing transitive properties of words and numerals. 

Speaking of extrapolation of triads and transitives ...
Knot my original intent [?]^^

[Original labels, added labels.]
A new triad?  Or quadratics? 

y. Economics 2011, x. Politics is local?, w. Romney takes leap,
z. (still to parse quadratics, under or over triads and transitives.)
v. No0000![!]? (/\/), u. ibid. [Not Nostradamus? ], t. ibid. s.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]
... k? l /~/ oops= Punderous Ponderings  QED?

note: oops/loops regards pol crack or error in extrapolation/anomalies/algorithms ~ Di-Spencer With... ? ~ Not to mention Ctrl F anacronism~

Ctrl F "math is next to ... "?  (b.s./ e, f, g, //?)  {?The Be All and End All? }
What the frack is that link doing in that blog search?

^^  ~ [?] "knot " rates 5 stars. / [?] = 5th link unread. / 2/3/4 ?= hip po clips? ~  re:wxyz

The Thorn and the Lyin'

Androcles or Ambrose?
But no Saint Donald*.
Trump claims** noble agenda.

Next? The President's Academic Records or Ayn Rand's.



*or J'Rome via Vulgate

** media and mess age(under wave)

[Back Log]
[And not too unribble ...hmmm.]
[By Jingo, QED? Or Here?]

Stuart Smally Anyone?

The Hollow World of George Bush
If positive thinking works, who needs weapons?
QED or Mobius Faith?

And what the heck are we positive about?
Only the shadow knows. What about between the words and the deeds?
The future may be our only end, but the golden rule is a two way street.

* http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/092504Z.shtml">original link updated